shiftingwinds: (Default)
"shi yasss queen" ([personal profile] shiftingwinds) wrote2021-02-13 07:15 pm

[7rings] catchall for steven

i'll make this post pretty when i'm less canonblind to steven
kokytos: ([110])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-15 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Hah. He huffs a derisive noise, clearly unimpressed with the event turnaround. Not that he particularly cares for nor about Vlad, but it was the principle of it all. ]

That "trial" wasn't a controlled environment. Anyone's emotions could sway the public, change the tide of the vote. If you're well-liked, maybe people won't vote you. If you're disliked, all it would take it just one accusation.
kokytos: ([83])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-15 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. It's a cruel system.

[ God knows why it is the way that it is... ]

One little mistake, and the cost is a whole life, or more.
kokytos: ([116])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-15 05:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Prisoner's Dilemma. Keynesian Beauty Contest. [ He rattles them off like he's had them ready -- and in a sense, sort of. He had just talked about it to Law yesterday. ]

"Reason" and "Logic" don't often work in societies, because emotions and self-interest will always sway the public to one direction or another. Humans just aren't capable of being rational.
kokytos: (816) something like "merry christmas. i hope santa shits in your mouth"? ([04])

1/2

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, ah. They're both thought problems, like hypothetical societal riddles.

The Prisoner's Dilemma is a game theory scenario, where two criminals are caught and jailed separately for their crimes, for a sentence each of three years. The warden gives each of them a special deal: if you rat out the other criminal, then your own sentence will be reduced, while the other serves an additional two years. Alternatively, if the other criminal rats you out, then the opposite holds true. If both people end up ratting each other out, then the sentence is extended by one year for both. Finally, if both people don't rat each other out, then there isn't enough evidence to keep them, and they're set free after their three year charge.

In a way, it's relevant to our scenario, because the "ratting out" is the votes. If we all cooperate, then we could come away with the best deal, which is no more extra lives lost to the executions; however, just a single vote could lead to your own death, which makes it so that it would be in your self-interest to vote someone else just in case.
kokytos: (262) At some point i am going to say to you "i have this really bad idea! You in?" just go with it. ([16])

2/2

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
The Keynesian Beauty Contest on the other hand, is more about economics, but I think the scenario applies decently. In this scenario, a town posts five pictures of beautiful women, and asks the populace to vote for the most beautiful woman. All the people who voted the most popular woman are awarded a prize; because of this, people won't vote for who they personally think is the most beautiful, but rather, who they think will be the most beautiful in the eyes of everyone else.

In summary, it's a scenario where people are rewarded for choosing what's popular, not what's objectively right. Which I think is also happening in the trials, due to the high pressure environment.

[ Sorry for being a nerd, ]

kokytos: (870) THREE MINUTES! THREE MINUTES PAST MIDNIGHT I STSRT HEARING CHRISTMAS MUSIC ON THE OVERHEAD PA SYSTEM!!! ([46])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
It's more the concept of mob mentality.

The wisest thing, of course, is to either not vote, or vote the appropriate culprit -- the most "beautiful". But look how easily we're swayed as a people.

Kaz's only reason for voting Beauregard was because someone else said so.
kokytos: ([87])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 05:12 am (UTC)(link)
[ Counterpoint Combo x2: Kaz definitely still voted. ]

Tricky balance, isn't it?
kokytos: ([64])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah... but that's also asking for a bit much.

You could ask every single person in this building to cooperate in peace, but what good will it do? I'm sure there will be people who won't believe you, may even doubt your intentions. Or maybe others who will take advantage of it, and take the opportunity to instead use everyone's lowered guard as a chance for murder.

[ Drink. ]
kokytos: ([93])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
[ ...

Yeah, he understands. He takes a sip of his own wine.
]

Sorry.
kokytos: ([116])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
[ Go for it SQX. Unbeknownst to you, your drinking power will be taken away tomorrow... ]

That's true. If there's an endgame to all of this, then the sooner it's found, the better. Less lives lost, less lives risked.
kokytos: ([80])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
[ ...He sighs, putting his chin in the crook of his palm. He's been doing way too much of this sighing stuff, but everything is so tiring. ]

I wonder how much indulging is "enough".
How have you been indulging so far?
kokytos: (330) be the chaos you wish to see in the world... ([53])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 06:10 am (UTC)(link)
[ He huffs a laugh. ]

Well, it definitely seems like you can hold it at any rate.
kokytos: ([105])

[personal profile] kokytos 2021-02-16 06:15 am (UTC)(link)
More like a superpower. [ God. Literally. ]

(no subject)

[personal profile] kokytos - 2021-02-16 06:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] kokytos - 2021-02-16 06:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] kokytos - 2021-02-16 06:48 (UTC) - Expand